Performance
Oak Hill Elementary — Academic Performance
Standardised assessments, graduation outcomes and college-readiness metrics for Oak Hill Elementary in Antelope, California.
Headline Indicator
—
Data not yet captured
Science (CAST)
California Science Test, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard, 2025
CAASPP
30%
Met or exceeded the standard
2025
6%
Exceeded the standard
103
Students tested
| Grade | Met or exceeded | Exceeded | Tested |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5 | 30% | 6% | 103 |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP science results for 2025. Percentages are of students with a reported score. Results for very small groups are suppressed by the state and show as -.
Results by Student Group
CAASPP 2025, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard for each reported student group
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| All students | 38% 421 tested | 22% 429 tested | 30% 103 tested |
| Gender | |||
| Female | 43% 190 tested | 20% 192 tested | 26% 46 tested |
| Male | 33% 231 tested | 24% 237 tested | 33% 57 tested |
| Race and ethnicity | |||
| Asian | 46% 57 tested | 32% 59 tested | 29% 14 tested |
| Black or African American | 32% 50 tested | 14% 49 tested | - |
| Filipino | 50% 16 tested | 40% 15 tested | - |
| Hispanic or Latino | 37% 98 tested | 17% 100 tested | 23% 22 tested |
| White | 34% 161 tested | 24% 164 tested | 30% 40 tested |
| Two or more races | 43% 35 tested | 16% 38 tested | 36% 11 tested |
| Socioeconomic status | |||
| Economically disadvantaged | 31% 261 tested | 18% 265 tested | 19% 52 tested |
| Not economically disadvantaged | 49% 160 tested | 29% 164 tested | 41% 51 tested |
| Homeless | 30% 33 tested | 19% 32 tested | - |
| English learners | |||
| English learners | 10% 69 tested | 13% 75 tested | 5% 20 tested |
| English learners, 12 months or more | 10% 68 tested | 15% 67 tested | 6% 16 tested |
| At risk of becoming a long term English learner | 0% 17 tested | 0% 16 tested | - |
| Reclassified fluent English proficient | 58% 45 tested | 40% 45 tested | 62% 13 tested |
| Initial fluent English proficient | 60% 20 tested | 40% 20 tested | - |
| Ever an English learner | 29% 114 tested | 23% 120 tested | 27% 33 tested |
| Never an English learner | 41% 307 tested | 22% 309 tested | 31% 70 tested |
| English only | 40% 287 tested | 21% 289 tested | 31% 65 tested |
| Disability | |||
| Students with disabilities | 8% 60 tested | 13% 63 tested | - |
| No reported disability | 43% 361 tested | 24% 366 tested | 31% 93 tested |
| Parent education | |||
| Parent not a high school graduate | 13% 24 tested | 8% 25 tested | - |
| Parent high school graduate | 19% 84 tested | 14% 83 tested | 25% 28 tested |
| Parent some college | 35% 103 tested | 20% 103 tested | 17% 24 tested |
| Parent college graduate | 55% 135 tested | 32% 137 tested | 42% 31 tested |
| Parent graduate school | 70% 20 tested | 35% 20 tested | - |
View 16 further student groups reported by the state
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not armed forces family member | 38% 421 tested | 22% 429 tested | 30% 103 tested |
| Not migrant education | 38% 421 tested | 22% 429 tested | 30% 103 tested |
| Not foster youth | 38% 420 tested | 22% 428 tested | 30% 102 tested |
| Not homeless | 38% 388 tested | 23% 397 tested | 32% 93 tested |
| Fluent English proficient and English only | 43% 352 tested | 24% 354 tested | 36% 83 tested |
| White (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 29% 98 tested | 22% 101 tested | 25% 20 tested |
| White (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 43% 63 tested | 27% 63 tested | 35% 20 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 27% 59 tested | 10% 61 tested | 14% 14 tested |
| Parent education declined to state | 31% 42 tested | 24% 42 tested | - |
| Black or African American (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 30% 40 tested | 13% 39 tested | - |
| Hispanic or Latino (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 51% 39 tested | 28% 39 tested | - |
| Asian (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 41% 37 tested | 30% 37 tested | - |
| Asian (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 55% 20 tested | 36% 22 tested | - |
| Two or more races (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 38% 21 tested | 10% 21 tested | - |
| Two or more races (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 50% 14 tested | 24% 17 tested | - |
| Filipino (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 67% 12 tested | 45% 11 tested | - |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP 2025 student group breakdown. Groups the state suppresses for privacy, or that are too small to report, show as - rather than zero. Groups overlap, so the figures do not sum to the all students row.
English Learner Proficiency (ELPAC)
English Language Proficiency Assessments for California, summative overall performance, 2025
2025
27%
Level 4, well developed
The level used towards reclassification
2025
59%
Level 3 or 4, moderately or well developed
119
English learners tested
| Grade | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 18 | 6% | 11% | 22% | 61% | 83% |
| Grade 1 | 12 | 33% | 33% | 25% | 8% | 33% |
| Grade 2 | 14 | 43% | 21% | 36% | 0% | 36% |
| Grade 3 | 18 | 17% | 17% | 56% | 11% | 67% |
| Grade 4 | 15 | 27% | 13% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| Grade 5 | 19 | 37% | 16% | 21% | 26% | 47% |
| Grade 6 | 23 | 4% | 26% | 39% | 30% | 70% |
Level 1 Minimally developed. Level 2 Somewhat developed. Level 3 Moderately developed. Level 4 Well developed.
View ELPAC by student group (26 groups)
| Student group | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No Special Education Services | 110 | 21% | 18% | 33% | 28% | 61% |
| ELs enrolled 12 months or more | 94 | 12% | 22% | 37% | 29% | 66% |
| Economically Disadvantaged | 94 | 16% | 22% | 37% | 24% | 62% |
| Male | 69 | 22% | 22% | 35% | 22% | 57% |
| Primary language: All remaining languages | 62 | 19% | 27% | 34% | 19% | 53% |
| White | 60 | 20% | 25% | 22% | 33% | 55% |
| Female | 50 | 22% | 16% | 28% | 34% | 62% |
| Asian | 31 | 13% | 16% | 52% | 19% | 71% |
| EL - 1 year in program | 27 | 22% | 33% | 19% | 26% | 44% |
| EL - less than 1 year in program | 25 | 60% | 8% | 12% | 20% | 32% |
| ELs enrolled fewer than 12 months | 25 | 60% | 8% | 12% | 20% | 32% |
| Not Economically Disadvantaged | 25 | 44% | 8% | 12% | 36% | 48% |
| Primary language: Russian | 25 | 32% | 8% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| EL - 2 years in program | 19 | 11% | 26% | 47% | 16% | 63% |
| At-Risk of LTEL | 18 | 17% | 22% | 33% | 28% | 61% |
| EL - 3 years in program | 18 | 0% | 11% | 56% | 33% | 89% |
| Hispanic or Latino | 18 | 28% | 17% | 33% | 22% | 56% |
| Primary language: Spanish | 18 | 28% | 17% | 33% | 22% | 56% |
| EL - 5 years in program | 13 | 8% | 23% | 23% | 46% | 69% |
| EL - 4 years in program | 9 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Special Education Services | 9 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - 6+ years in program | 8 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Homeless | 8 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Primary language: Punjabi | 7 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Two or more races | 5 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Primary language: Filipino (Pilipino or Tagalog) | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: school_elpac, California Department of Education summative ELPAC 2025. Percentages are of English learners with a reported overall performance level. Grades and groups too small to report are suppressed by the state and show as -, which is not the same as zero.
Sources: state assessment files (EDFacts), school_graduation_v2 (NCES adjusted-cohort), school_sat_act + CRDC SAT/ACT.